India's Struggle for Independence
The heroic struggle waged by the people of India to liberate themselves from
foreign rule was the result of the rise and growth of Indian nationalism. Indian
nationalism took birth in the nineteenth century as a result of the conditions
created by British rule. British rule was intended only to serve the interests
of the ruling classes of Britain. This was the cause of the fundamental
antagonism between the British government and the Indian people.
The rise of nationalism marks a definite stage in the development of human
societies everywhere in the world. The British conquest had disrupted the
evolution of Indian society through internal processes. Nationalism, therefore,
arose in India, as in other countries which were victims of imperialist
conquest, under conditions created by foreign rule. With the growth of
nationalism, the demands of the Indian people assumed as
increasingly nationalist character. Beginning with the demand to
have a share in administration, it developed into the struggle for complete
independence. The Character of the struggle was also gradually transformed.
Beginning with constitutional agitation by small sections of educated people, it
gradually turned into a revolutionary struggle, peaceful though not
constitutional, of the overwhelming majority of the people of India. Besides
being a struggle for political independence, it also became a struggle for the
reconstruction of India society on the basis of democracy and social equality.
The Revolt of
1857
The people in different parts of India, right from the beginning of the
British conquest, never acquiesced in their political subjection. Not a year
passed without an armed resistance to British rule in one part of the country or
the other. Some of these revolts were those of the Sanyasis in Bengal and Bihar
(1763 Onwards), of the peasants (Midnapur in 1766, Rangpur in 1783, Mysore
in 1830 -31, Khandesh in 1852), of the chiefs and other landed sections (for
Ramnathapuram, Shivaganga and other places during 1795-1805, of Velu thambi in
Travancore in 1808-09, of Rani Chinnamma of Kittur during 1824-29, etc.), and of
the tribal people (notably of the Bhils during 1817-31, the Kols during 1820-37,
the Khasis under U. Tirot Singh during 1829-33, the Santhals during 1855-56,
etc. There were also mutinies, for example, at Vellore in 1806. All these
revolts were, however sporadic and localized and though some of them lasted many
years, they did not pose a serious challenge to British rule. The greatest of
the revolts, which shook the very foundations of British rule, occurred in 1857.
The revolt began at Meerut on 10 May 1857, with the
uprising of Indian sepoys of the British arms on India. It was the result of
accumulated resentment, which had been growing since the beginning of
British conquest, but was triggered off by the greased cartridge incident. In
fact the cause were much deeper that this.
Peasants had been dispossessed of their lands and artisans had been ruined.
The British policy of annexation of territory had led to the dispossession of
many Indian rulers. As a result of these, discontent was widespread. Dalhousie,
who came India as the Governor - General, annexed eight new states in the course
of eight years of his stay in office. There was also fear in the minds of many
people that the British government was out to forcibly convert them to
Christianity. That the British government paid scant regard to the
religious beliefs of the Indian people is clear from the use of the greased
cartridge. Thus the British government had alienated vast numbers of people -
common people as well as former rulers - and resentment had been building up for
some time. Lord Metacalfe, who was the Governor - General in 1835-36, had
written: All India is at all time looking out for our downfall. The people
everywhere would rejoice, or fancy they would rejoice at our destruction. And
members are not wanting who would promote it by all means in their power. A
little over 20 years after, the revolt broke out.
The revolt soon spread over northern, central and eastern India. The rebels
declared Bahadur Shah II, the Mughal King, the Emperor of Hindustan.
Hindus and Muslim fought shoulder to shoulder against the British. The deeds of
valor of rebels, like the Rani of Jhansi, Maulvi Ahmadulla, Kanwar Singh, Bakht
Khan and Tantia Tope, have become proud legends and have inspired the later
generation.
The revolt was suppressed after biter fighting for over a year, though peace
was not restored until 1859. The British rulers followed a ruthless and
indiscriminate policy of vengeance. Thousands of people were hanged in Delhi, Lucknow and other places. The inhuman reprisals of the
British government provoked resentment even in England. Many Englishmen
protested against the barbarities of the British rulers and expressed their
sympathy and support for the Indian People. The revolt and its cruel suppression
left a legacy of bitterness and hatred amongst the people of India.
The revolt marked a turning point in the history of India. The rule of the
East India Company Came to an end and the control passed to the British Crown.
The British government promised not to annex any more Indian States. The Indian
states accepted the paramountcy of the British government and became loyal
allies of the British rule.
The revolt made the Indian people more politically conscious than before. The
movements of social reform and modernization had already started. These
movements gathered momentum. The hold of the Indian princes on the Indian people
declined and it was increasingly realized that national independence would be
attained through a movement of the people themselves and not under the
leadership of the old rulers of India. The struggle against the rulers on Indian
states itself became a part of the national struggle for the independence. The
most valuable legacy of the revolt was the memory of united struggle. Soon India
was to witness the growth of the nationalist movement aiming at national
independence democracy, social equality and national development.
Back To Top
Rise of Indian Nationalism Early Phase
1858-1905
Nationalism is a phenomenon which appeared in world history after the close
of the Middle Ages. Nation-states had begun to be formed with definite
boundaries, with a definite political system within these boundaries, with the
uniformity of laws and with the people inhabiting the state living under the
same political, social and economic system and sharing common aspirations. The
middle class had played a significant role in the formation of nation-states. In
many countries of Europe, like Italy and Germany, nationalism emerged as a
powerful force only in the nineteenth century. The French Revolution of 1789 had
added a new element to the phenomenon of nationalism. It identified the nation
with the people. This meant that, in a nation, the people were sovereign.
Wherever, after 1800 or so, new sovereign states have been called into
experienced a violent of abrupt change of political order, they were best
explained as conjunction of these two forces. at work -- Nationalism and
Democracy.
The growth of the Indian nationalism started in the nineteenth century.
Political unification of the country, destruction of India's old social and
economic system, the beginning of modern trade and industry and the rise of new
social classes laid the basis of nationalism. The social and religious revolts
contributed to the growth of nationalism.
British rule was inimical to the interest of almost all sections of Indian
society. The peasants were suffering under the new land-tenure systems
introduced by the British. The Indian Industrialist were not happy because of
the economic policy of the British government. For example all import duties on
cotton textiles were removed in 1882 which harmed the nascent Indian textile
Industry. the educated people suffered because they were discriminated against.
Almost all sections of the Indian society realized that their interests were
antagonistic to British rule. The people of India became aware of the fact that
the development of their country was not possible unless British rule was ended.
All these factors forged the people of India into a Nation and this
consciousness expressed itself in the struggle for national independence.
Several other factors helped in the growth of national consciousness amongst
India people. The exploitation of India by the British rules and dislocation
caused by their policies worsened the condition of the already impoverished
masses. There was a series of famines which took a toll of millions of human
lives due to the indifference of the autocratic British administration. The
British government made use of Indian resources to pursue its imperialist aims
in other parts of Asia. The Governor General (now also the Viceroy) was the
supreme authority in the country, responsible only to British parliament
thousands of miles away. He was assisted by executive and legislative councils,
which consisted of persons, mostly Englishmen appointed by him. Indian
people had no say in the administration of the country. The Indian civil
Service, which ran the administration of the country also consisted mostly of
Englishmen . Though Indians could appear for competitive examinations were held
in England and fey could afford to appear for them.
Another factor was the practice of racial discrimination. Before the revolt
of 1857, many Englishmen, officials and others, were not averse to mixing
socially with Indians. After the revolt, the feeling of racial superiority grew
and everything Indian appeared inferior and barbaric to them. They were
exclusive clubs and railway coaches for Europeans where the entry of
Indians was prohibited. As Jawaharlal Nehru put it, "India as a nation and
Indians as individuals were subjected to insult, humiliation ant contemptuous
treatment." The feeling of racial superiority may be seen from the
failure of the libert Bill in1883. The bill sought to bring Indians and
Europeans on par as far as the criminal jurisdiction of court was concerned and
to withdraw the privilege enjoyed by Europeans of being tried by a judge of
their own race only. The Europeans launched an agitation against the bill and it
was withdrawn.
The British government consistently followed a policy of repression after
1857. Many measures of the government provoked widespread agitation. Tow of
these were the Vernacular Press Act of 1878 and the Arms Act of 1879. The former
Act imposed severe restriction on the freedom of the press and the later forbade
the possession of arms by Indians.
Thus, various factors contributed to the rise of the nationalist movement. In
the last quarter of the nineteenth century, the movement started assuming an
all-India form. Beginning with the demand for small concessions, the
nationalist movement for complete independence of India. The American War of
Independence, the French Revolution, the wars of Italian unification, and the
Ideas of Voltaire, Rosseau, Thomos Paine and Garibaldi and Mazzini (who were the
leaders of the struggle for Italian Unification) provided inspiration to Indian
nationalist. In the twentieth century, the ideas of socialism and
internationalism influenced them.
Back To Top
Early Political Movements and the Indian
National Congress
A number of political organizations came into existence in the later half of
the nineteenth century. As early as 1851, the British Indian Association was
formed in Bengal to represent Indian grievances to the British government. In
1876, Surendranath Banerjee founded the Indian Association in Bengal. DadaBhai
Naoroji had started the Bombay Association. Some of the other associations
were the Madras Native Association formed in 1852, the Puna Sarvajanik Sabha and
the Madras Mahajan Sabha set up in 1870 and 1884 respectively. Attempts were
made to form an All India organization. In 1883, Surendranath Banerjee called
All-India National Conference which was described by its President as the first
step to a National Parliament. In 1885, Indian National Congress was founded. In
the founding of the Congress, a retired English civil servant, A.O. Hume, played
an important role. The Governor General, Lord Dufferine blessed the Congress. He
thought the Congress would be a good forum for the government to keep itself
informed regarding the best Indian Public opinion. Soon however the Congress was
to become a revolutionary organization leading the Indian people to
independence.
Even at the first session of the congress held in Bombay, under the
Presidentship of W.C. Bannerjee all regions of India were represented. Persons
attending the session belong to different religious faiths. The problems, that
were discussed concerned all Indians, Irrespective of their religion, caste
language and region. Thus the Indian nationalist movement, which the congress
represented, was from the start, an all-India secular movement embracing every
section of Indian society. It was attended by such eminent person as Dadabhai
Naoroji, Badruddin Tyabji, W.C. Banerjee, G Subramanya, Aiyer, P. Ananda Charlu,
Behramji Malabari and N.G. Chandavarkar.
The Congress followed a moderate program during the first two years of its
coming into existence. The aim of the congress, as outlined by its President,
W.C. Banerjee, was to enable the workers in the cause of national progress to
become personally known to each other and to unite the people of India for
common political ends irrespective of differences in respect of race and
language or social and religious institutions. The Congress held its session
once a year passed resolutions for the consideration of the government. They
demanded not independence but representative institutions. Some of the early
demands of the congress were for elected representatives in the provincial and
central legislative councils, holding the Indian Civil Service Examinations in
India and raising the minimum age of entry, the reduction of military
expenditure, the spread of education, industrial development of India, relief in
agricultural indebtedness and the amendment of the Arms Act.
The leadership of the Congress, which included leaders like Surendranath
Banerjee, M.G. Ranade, Gopal Krishna Gokhale, R.C. Dutta and Pherozeshah Mehta,
had faith in justness of their demands and in the British government. They
believed that, as soon as the British government was convinced of the justness
of their demands these would be accepted. They wanted not separation but
association with British Government. Surendranath Banerjee, for example said
"It is not severance that we look forward to but unification, permanent
embodiment as an integral part of that great empire that has given the rest of
the world the models of free institutions." However, the criticism of the
government gradually increased at the sessions of the Congress and more
radical demands were raised. At the second session of the Congress, one speaker
said " Self - Government is the arbiter of nature and the will of Divine
Providence. Every nation must be arbiter of its destiny. But do we govern
ourselves ? No, are we not living then in an unnatural state ? Yes ". With
the growth of these radical ideas in the congress, the government became hostile
to it. Government servant were barred from attending the Congress Sessions. Lord
Dufferin referred to it contemptuously as representing a 'Microscopic
Minority' and being unworthy of
attention.
In the early period, the congress was dominated by what were called
'Moderates'. Its demand were primarily demands of the educated middle class and
rising Indian industrialists. However, it played an extremely significant role
in the early stages of the growth of the Indian nationalist movement. Its
emphasis on national unity, its criticism of the drain of Indian wealth, its
demand for representative institutions and Indianization of services, its
opposition to repressive measures like the Arms Act and its constant
underscoring of people's poverty as the basic factor of Indian politics helped
to put the nationalist movement on sound foundations. This phase of the movement
lasted till about 1905.
Back To Top
Indian Nationalist Movement (1905-1919)
Even the moderate demands of the Congress were not accepted by British
Government. The non-fulfillment demands, combined with the rising awareness
among the people led to the growth of a radical wing in the Congress which
advanced the movement further. A new phase began in the history of the Indian
nationalist movement. New demands were made and new methods of struggle adopted
with increased mass mobilization.
Back To Top
Rise of Extremism
At the turn of the century. a new trend developed which has been called
'Extremism'. Under the influence of the new trend the nationalist movement gave
up the practice of merely issuing appeals to the government and adopted new
radical ways of political agitation. The demands put forward also assumed a more
radical character. Several new factors contributed to this.
Curzon came to India as the new Viceroy in December 1898. During his period
of Viceroyalty, he imposed extremely unpopular measures which intensified the
opposition to British rule. He had said that he would assist in the 'Peaceful
demise' of the Congress. When he left India, the Congress and the Nationalist
movement were stronger than ever before and had, in fact, assumed new
dimensions.
His most unpopular act was the partition of Bengal. The object of the measure
was given out as administrative convenience. The leaders could clearly see that
it was actually measure to divide the people. East Bengal was to be a
Muslim majority province and the West a Hindu majority province. The
partition was designed to disrupt Hindu - Muslim unity and thus weaken the
nationalist movement. However, the effect of the measure belied the hopes of the
British Government. It provoked an agitation and such angry reaction against
British rule that the partition measure had to be annulled.
International events also contributed to the growth of vigorous nationalism.
Russia was defeated by Japan in 1905. This was the first victory over an
European Nation. Although Japan herself was turning into an imperialist gains in
China, Japan's victory gave confidence to the Indian nationalist in their
struggle against Britain. the revolution had aimed at the overthrow of the
Czarist autocracy but had been suppressed. The revolution also influenced the
thinking of Indian nationalist.
The group which led the 'Extremists' in the Congress consisted of Bal
Gangadhar Tilak, Bipin Chandra Pal, Lala Rajpat Rai. It was usually referred to
as "Lal Bal Pal". They extolled the past of India in order to
inculcate self-confidence and national pride in the Indian people. Tilak had
been active in the Congress since 1890. In 1897 he was prosecuted and sentenced
to 18 months rigorous imprisonment for his seditious writing and speeches. He
had started a newspaper 'Kesari' in Marathi through which he conducted his
nationalist campaigns. He revived the 'Ganapati and Shivaji' festivals and made
use of them fir arousing national feelings. He exhorted people to action which
according to him, was the true message of the Bhagwat Gita
. In this period the 'Extremist' wing came to be more and more concerned with
arousing pride in Indian Culture. In Bengal the cult of the Goddess Kali was
adopted. The extremist condemned the old leadership of the Congress for their
praise of Western culture and their faith in the British Government.
There was a wide divergence between the views of the extremist and the
moderates on the means to achieve political rights. Tilak summed up the
difference thus "Political rights will have to be fought for. The
moderates think that these can be won by persuasion. We think that they can only
be got by strong pressure". The extremist leaders drew masses into the
struggle, particularly in urban areas. The mobilization of the people,
particularly the youth for the struggle was a major contribution of the
extremists.
Back To Top
The Boycott and Swadeshi Movements
The partition of Bengal created widespread indignation all over the country.
In the turbulent atmosphere that followed the boycott and Swadeshi movements
started. Swadeshi literally meaning of one's own country, aimed at the promotion
of indigenous industry. Along with Swadeshi, boycott of British goods was
organized. The Swadeshi and boycott were powerful instruments directed against
foreign rule. They attacked the British rule where it hurt most. About Swadeshi
Lalpat Rai said " I regard it as a salvation of my country. the Swadeshi
movement ought to teach us how to organize our capital, resources, labor,
energies, talents for the greatest good of all Indians irrespective of creed,
color or caste. It ought to unite us, our religious and denominational
differences notwithstanding. In my opinion, Swadeshi ought to be the common
religion of united India.". On the boycott movement, he said, "The
meaning of the boycott is this ... The primary thing is prestige of the
government and the boycott strikes at the root of the prestige. The illusory
thing they call prestige is more powerful and potent than authority itself and
propose to do this by boycott -- We desire to turn away our faces from the
government house and turn them to the huts of people".
It was at the height of nation-wide protest movement against the partition of
Bengal that the annual session of the Congress was held at Calcutta in 1906. At
the session Dadabhai Naoroji sponsered the new programme of the congress which
had been advocated by the Extremist. Dadabhai's support for the stewardship of
the programme led to its general approval. For the first time, it declared the
attainment of Swaraj as the aim of the Congress. Swaraj or self-government was
defined as the system of government obtaining in the self governing British
colonies. The Swadeshi and the boycott movements were favored as the means of
resistance. Promotion of national education was declared as an aim of the
Congress.
The Swadeshi and boycott movements spread to many parts of country. Shops
selling foreign goods were picketed. Students played an important part in the
Swadeshi and boycott movement. Meetings were held all over the country and
associations were formed. The government restored to repressive measures. Meeting
were banned, the chanting of the nation song Bande Mataram
composed by Bankim Chandra Chatterjee was prohibited, recognition was withdrawn
from schools and grants were stopped, processionists were lathi-charged and
various attempts were made to strike terror in the people. However, all the
measures of oppression were of no avail. The popular upheaval was so intense
that many people came to believe that the end of British rule was near. It was
at the first time that Tilak wrote ' Repression is repression, if it is legal,
it must be resisted peacefully; but if it is illegal, it must be illegally
met". He also gave Congress the slogan "Swaraj is my birth right and I
shall have it." The movement continued into the year 1907. The nationalist
newspaper were banned and their editors prosecuted. Many leaders were
imprisoned.
In 1907, the 23rd session of the Congress was held at Surat. here the 'Moderats'
and the extremist came into conflict. The 'Moderates' wanted to modify the
resolutions Swadeshi and the boycott passed at Calcutta session in the previous
year. They also wanted to write into the constitution of the congress a clause
that self-government was to be achieved through constitutional means and by
reforming the existing system administration. They were opposed the
intensification of the movement. Tilak tried to capture the leadership of the
Congress. There ensued disorderly scenes and session broke up. The two group
later meet separately. Leadership of Congress remained in the hands of moderate
group. The 'extremist' worked separately until the reunion in 1916.
Meanwhile, the repressive measures of the government continued. The
repression was particularly brutal in,
Maharastra,Punjab and Tamil Nadu.
In 1907 the Seditious meeting Act was passed to prevent the holding of meeting
'Likely to promote the disturbance of public tranquility'. In 1910, the Indian
Press Act was passed which gave the authorities wide power to punish the editor
of any paper which publish the matter which in their view was incitement
rebellion. The government deported people without trial under a century old law.
A numbers of newspapers were banned and leaders imprisoned and deported. Tilak
was sentenced to six years imprisonment deported to Mandalay for two articles
which he had published in his paper Keshari. His arrest was
widely resented and led to one of the earliest strikes in the history of the
India by the textile workers of Bombay.
Thus in the first decade of the twentieth century the nationalist movement
entered a new phase. More and more people were drawn into it. And they were no
longer satisfied by appeals to the government. The association of religion with
the movements in some places encouraged communal thinking and proved harmful.
Back To Top